Twice-Stolen Land Land Reform
|January 9, 2007||Posted by Staff under Archive, Progress Report, The Progress Report|
by Fred E. Foldvary, Senior Editor
Most Americans are aware that much of the land in the United States was taken from the Indians through force and fraud. But folks then have a picture in mind of that land being settled by sturdy pioneers who homesteaded land by cultivating it. The popular image seem to be that even though the land was unjustly stolen from the Indians, at least it was properly handed over to small farmers who made good use of it. If that’s your impression, we need to go over some history that has been kept out of the school books.
The federal government had possession of the lands beyond the original 13 colonies. This was called the “public domain.” Most of it was not homesteaded by farmers for their own use, but was granted in large tracts to politically-connected speculators to hold and rent out while the value increased. In fact, as noted by the historian Charles Beard, the U.S. Constitution itself was promoted by speculators who wanted a strong central government to clear out the Indians and use the federal government to grant them huge estates of land. The land grabbing started even before the U.S. Constitution was adopted, as the land in Kentucky, which was at first part of Virginia, was handed over to absentee speculators in the 1780s. Large land holdings there and later on in Alabama and Mississippi (where the Yazoo land companies took the land by fraud) enabled slavery to become extended and entrenched.
Land speculators formed companies that bid for large grants from the state and federal governments, with some bribery on the side. Much of the land that was obtained under the Homestead Act was seized by speculators via fraud, such as with false statements or by putting cabins on wheels. War Veterans during the 1800s were paid in part with warrants for land, and most of these were sold to land speculators for 25 cents per acre, and the speculators then resold the land to pioneer settlers for $2 per acre. This sordid history is related by Henry George in his 1871 book, Our Land and Land Policy and also by Benjamin Hibbard in A History of the Public Land Sales. I’ve also written a paper on this topic to present to the conference of the Southern Economic Association.
The most notorious land grants were to the railroads. The railroad companies were at first given one square mile of land per mile of rail line, which was doubled in 1864 to two square miles and in some cases to four square miles. The rail companies were also granted the privilege of cutting timber on federal land.
In California, much of the fraud took place on Mexican land grants, which were recognized by the U.S. government. The borders of these lands were not well defined, and the Mexican holders were unfamiliar with U.S. law. They were taken advantage of by speculators, and most of these land passed on to other owners. In many cases, the land was taken by fraud, such as with forged papers and bogus grants, backed by the local sheriff and U.S. troops.
Then there was the Swamp Lands Act of 1850. Wetlands sold for $1 per acre, and the dollar could be spent for reclamation, making the land free. Half of the land sold as swampland was dry land sold to speculators with friends in Washington. In one case, since the law required that the swamp be navigable by boat, the buyer put a boat on a wagon and had a team of horses pull it across!
Land was also disposed of by the Desert Land Act of 1877. The lands were to be sold to those who provided irrigation. Some tycoons grabbed the land using false statements before the law was published, and then dislodged pioneers who had settled the land under the older laws. The Timber and Stone Act of 1878 and the General Mining Law of 1872 were more giveaways of valuable natural resources, which continue to this day. Another huge privilege given away has been the electro-magnetic spectrum, the natural resource of TV and radio waves.
All these land grants have helped create massive inequalities of wealth in the United States. Also, since the land could have been rented out to users instead, Americans have been burdened with taxes on their labor and products rather than using the public domain for public revenue.
We can see that most of the land in the U.S. was stolen twice, first from the American Indians, and secondly from the American people as owners of the public domain. We can’t give most of the land back to the Indians, other than compensating them for their losses — it would be too disruptive to change land titles — but we can put the benefits of the land back into the public domain for all, by making its rent common property. A gradual increase in the collection of the market land rent would be accompanied by the reduction of taxes on production. We can’t reverse the fraud and take back the stolen loot, but we can always implement economic justice, just as the U.S. finally freed the slaves. Just because we have gone in the wrong direction in the past does not mean that we must keep wandering down the path of fraud, theft, and injustice in the future as well. Maybe if more folks become aware of how the land of the free was twice-stolen, they will start thinking about who properly should benefit from the land that was once our common domain.
What’s your opinion on stolen land? Tell The Progress Report what you think!
Copyright 1997 by Fred E. Foldvary. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, which includes but is not limited to facsimile transmission, photocopying, recording, rekeying, or using any information storage or retrieveal system, without giving full credit to Fred Foldvary and The Progress Report.