Nahua Seek Land Rights While Speculators Seize Natural Wealth
|January 18, 2004||Posted by Staff under The Progress Report|
Western “Land Ownership” Concept Does Not Fit All
The Nahua Quest for Territory
Here are highlights from a recent latinamericapress.org article circulated by oneworld.net
by Barbara J. Fraser
It took José Dispupidiwa Wasi a week to travel from his community to Lima, Peru’s capital. Dispupidiwa Wasi is the curaca or traditional chief of the Nahua community of Serjali, deep in the jungle of southeastern Peru. With four other community authorities, he made the journey about five days by river and two over the Andes on a bus to seek government-recognized title to his peoples ancestral lands.
The trip follows up letters that the Nahua leaders sent to government officials earlier. We waited and waited for a reply, but it never came, said Jader Flore Gómez, president of the community of Serjali.
While the Nahua and other semi-nomadic groups are often referred to as being uncontacted, the word is a misnomer. Most have had some contact with the outside world, particularly with loggers or oil company workers. Abused or ill from diseases to which they had no resistance, they have fled deeper into the forest, their lives ever more precarious.
Because they shun contact with outsiders, there are no completely reliable statistics about these groups. But based on reports by anthropologists and health workers, as well as information from loggers and others who have had encounters with them, there are an estimated 10 to 15 groups in several parts of the Peruvian rainforest.
Even their isolation is relative, however. During the rubber boom of the early 1900s, many indigenous people in the Amazon were enslaved by adventurers and rubber barons.
When the oil giant Shell began working in Camisea, near the Urubamba River, in the 1980s, its workers reported contact with nomadic indigenous people. Roads and paths built by the company also allowed illegal loggers and speculators to enter the area, bringing diseases some as simple as the flu or a cold to which the Nahua people, also known as the Yora, had no resistance.
The result, according to Vladimir Pinto of the Pro Human Rights Association of Lima, was practically a genocide. Experts estimate that between 40 percent and 70 percent of the Nahua died.
In an effort to avoid similar disasters, in 1990 the government established the Kugapakori-Nahua Reserve to protect nomadic people living in isolation and those who were in the initial stages of contact. With their family groups decimated, many of the surviving Nahua settled down, establishing the community of Serjali on the river of the same name in Ucayali Department in central-eastern Peru.
The reserve, which is administered by the government, was originally meant to be temporary, providing protection until the indigenous groups living within its boundaries established settlements and claimed title to their own territories.
The 260 families living in Serjali are the first to do so. During their visit to Lima in mid-November, the community leaders asked for title to 180,000 hectares, almost 40 percent of the 457,435-hectare reserve. That in itself creates a dilemma.
What worries us is that this might mean dissolving the reserve at a very critical moment, when there various types of pressure are being brought to bear on the indigenous people living there, Pinto said.
Several other groups including other Nahua, some Nanti and possibly a group of Machiguenga families still live a nomadic life within the reserve. It is not clear whether their wanderings take them into the land that the residents of Serjali are claiming, Pinto said. If they do, titling the land could constitute an infringement of their rights.
The Nahuas situation is very unusual and comes after a traumatic process of contact. We cant forget that and simply say theyre a community that wants a land title. Thats their right but it needs to be done in such a way that the rest of the peoples in the reserve are not affected, Pinto says.
Peru has set aside five reserves for nomadic indigenous people. Because they are protected, they often contain the last stands of valuable mahogany. As a result, they are attractive to loggers who enter the areas illegally. As of August 2001, 16 groups of illegal loggers were reported to be working inside the land the Nahua are claiming as their territory. By June 2002, they had cut 600,000 cubic feet of mahogany and cedar, according to Shinai Serjali, a non-governmental organization that works with the Nahua of Serjali.
Another difficult issue is the Nahua request to be allowed to selectively cut trees inside the reserve on the land they claim as their territory. Except for Camisea, commercial use of natural resources in the reserve is currently prohibited. Some observers worry that if the Nahua are allowed to cut and sell timber, it could set a precedent for illegal seizure of resources in other protected areas.
The Nahua argue that since disease and decimation forced them to settle in Serjali, contact with the outside world has created a series of new needs, some of which must be met with cash.
My community needs everything there are no notebooks or pencils for the children, no machetes, axes, pots or pans, Dispupidiwa Wasi says.
Logging is not the only threat. Three of the wells in the Camisea gas field lie inside the Nahua-Kugapakori Reserve and the petroleum concession known as Lot 57, which is currently open for bids, overlaps the protected area. The indigenous leaders who visited Lima won a promise from the government to exclude the reserve from Lot 57. If the community gains its title, that would mean it would no longer fall within the reserve. In that case, Pinto said, the territory may once again fall within the lot.
Theyd be the owners of their territory, and they could negotiate with the company that takes over Lot 57, but we know how that has gone in other parts of the Peruvian and Ecuadoran Amazon, Pinto says.
What a mess! The Western concept of land ownership seems to push some plain, simple human beings into a thicket of complications. And it’s not their fault. What do you think is the best way forward out of this situation? Tell your views to The Progress Report!