Sprawl - like Elvis - is everywhere
by Lindy Davies
Today's economy offers certain guidelines to those who set out to
build a house, shopping center, restaurant or office building:
1- Always choose the remotest possible location. Stay as far from
the center of town as possible. Make suburban sprawl come to you.
2- The best place to build is the site that requires the most
public investment in roads, sewer and other infrastructure.
3- Farms outside of urban areas should be replaced, whenever
possible, by residential subdivisions.
4- Remember that grading for new construction maximizes
groundwater pollution, so never use an existing site if a new one
can be cleared.
5- Above all, never, ever design a community that lets people
walk to work or shops. Driving is always better.
The funny thing about
sprawl - in the United States anyway - is
that when we had plenty of land, when we had a whole empty
continent to expand into, towns didn't sprawl. Transportation was
difficult. It took the miracle of Personal transportation to make
people willing to travel large distances to buy a loaf of bread,
go to work, or visit their neighbors.
The rise of the automobile was the first great cause of the
social
and ecological catastrophe of suburban sprawl. The second
was the chronic decline of cities. In city after city, soaring
costs of public services have driven taxpayers to flee. Developed
land, richly provided with public infrastructure, is left to
decay, leap-frogged by new development eating up fertile farmland
and demanding ever more roads, sewers, power lines and parking
lots.
The "guidelines" mentioned above are mandated by our tax policy.
It's as if an omnipotent sovereign decided that suburban sprawl
is the very best way to plan a society and set out unerringly
to achieve it. Here's how:
1- Land speculation makes it profitable to hold the best, most
valuable land out of use, for as long as possible, and develop
marginal land. This is enforced by high taxes on buildings and
other improvements, and very low taxes on the value of land.
2- Productive workers are taxed to raise revenue for public
infrastructure; when it is provided, it raises land values. So,
if you build out past the existing roads and other amenities, you
create a demand for the community to build new facilities, which
will raise the value of your land.
3- Suburban sprawl makes the value of land for residential
subdivisions far greater than for farming, creating an often-
irresistible pressure on farmers to cash in.
4- Groundwater contamination through runoff creates ill effects
that are often remote, in both time and place, from the original
source of the runoff; hence such "nonpoint" pollution can be
engaged in with virtual impunity.
5- Federal investment in highways and a national commitment to
low oil prices have made gasoline-powered automobiles so cheap
and convenient that public transportation cannot compete; the
car's stranglehold on US culture remains unthreatened.
There is a common thread in all of these problems, and the search
for a solution should focus on it. In every case, the value of
land - of locations, natural resources, clean air & water - is
created by the entire community. Yet it is collected by a few
"owners" who have inherited a so-called right to this unearned
rent. So, to raise public revenue, we have resorted to a tax
system that penalizes production and rewards waste and pollution.
We can reverse the pervasive trend toward sprawl. Collect the
value of land for public revenue, and make land speculation
unprofitable, taking away the incentives that lead to urban
sprawl and its unconscionable waste of resources, energy and
habitat. Want to know
more?
----------------------------------------
This article appears courtesy of The Henry George Institute
|