who owns britain
land ownership conventration

Review of Who Owns Britain

"Who Owns Britain". Published 29th November 2001. by Kevin Cahill, ISBN 086241 912 3.

reviewed by John Burns-Curtis

The Land for the People

Kevin Cahill has taken 13 years of brilliant investigative research to complete this book, "Who Own Britain", and uncovers an aristocratic/Tory party conspiracy to keep the land in the hands of the chosen few. It exposes a conspiracy of gigantic proportions. Kevin started his research after being tasked with the aristocracy in the first Sunday Times "Rich List." He came across brick walls of misinformation, lies, and no information at all. The Land Registry still only notes half of England's land, after being in existence for 76 years. Kevin has worked in both the Commons and the Lords and is fully familiar with the working of these chambers.

He uncovers the successful conspiracy to take out of circulation the second Doomsday Book, the 1872 Return of Land Owners, that documented who owns what. The aristocratic landowners, through their House of Lords influence and Tory party connections, successfully took the second Doomsday book out of circulation, and attempted to prevent a similar one being done just before WW1, causing the then Liberal government to restrict their powers in 1910. WW1 prevented the census from being completed. They did not want the people to know how much of the land the privileged few owned. Out of sight, out of mind.

The 1872 Second Doomsday book covered the current UK and the Irish Republic, which were all one nation at the time. What Kevin Cahill does is compare Ireland right now to the UK. Ireland re-distributed land and the results are all too clear to see. The Irish economy is booming and most of the wealth, contrary to what people think in the UK, is internally generated, not via handouts from the EU. There is no estate over 5,000 acres in Ireland.

The UK currently is uncompetitive in many areas, not because of the high valued pound, it is the high rents that prevent foreign companies setting up here. Also UK companies will think twice before opening a branch or depot simply because of the high rents due to the high land values, brought about by the artificial shortage, created by the appalling situation of land being in the hands of too few and backed by a highly restrictive planning system.

The economic boom in the Irish Republic is fuelled by land re-distribution. People build larger and better homes than in the UK, as land is cheaper so more money is spent on the structure and internal fitments, improving their quality of life and creating a larger construction industry, which is by nature is manpower intensive securing jobs.

In 1872 "most" of the Irish people owned "nothing at all". During the famine almost all the population also owned "nothing at all" (the 1 million dead was due to land ownership and laws not the potato blight), with Ireland almost wholly owned by a few large landowners. Since having self rule, the Irish now have more home ownership in percentage terms than the UK, with larger houses and houses that do not have between 50%-75% of the value being the value of the land. There are some anomalies around Dublin. They also do not have unnecessarily restrictive planning laws that act against the interest of the masses and favour the chosen few as in the UK. The more sensible planning system assists the land-redistribution and the economy as a whole.

In 2001 52,000 new homes were built in the Irish Republic which has a population of 3.4 million. The UK, with a population of 60 million managed a mere 170,000. The House Builders Federation indicated that highly restrictive planning laws curtail much needed housebuilding in the UK.

Rents for industry, commerce and domestic are cheaper as a result, attracting external investment. Their economy is growing at a faster rate than the UK and clearly appears a permanent trend, not a temporary boom.

Put all this down to land ownership. Giving the people a stake in their own country, and not under the tyranny of landlords. A country, which they are expected to die for in times of extreme crisis.

Land reform was promised to the UK people after WW1 by the Liberals, and after WW2 by Labour. "A land fit for heroes". All failed to deliver. We are suffering today as a consequence of not tackling the underlying fundamental problems. Land and its ownership.

It is a startling expose of Britain's most valuable asset - its land. Kevin Cahill's investigations reveal how the 6,000 or so landowners - mostly aristocrats, but also large institutions and the Crown - own about 40 million acres [the UK has 60 million in total], two thirds of the country, and have maintained their grip on the land right throughout the 20th century. The book argues that our present system of landownership is of material detriment to the vast majority of homeowners in the UK, imposing taxes on homeowners while many of the wealthiest landowners in the country pay no rates and actually receive money in the form of grants and subsidies for owning land. Cahill's arguments are supported with 80 pages of tables, maps and statistics.


All figures are referenced and verifiable.

The failure to re-distribute land in the UK is one of the prime factors why the UK under-performed during most of the 20th century. The artificial land shortage in the UK ramps up land prices, seriously affecting the availability and quality of homes, commercial space, etc. Under 1% of the population own 70% of the land, something you expect from a third world dictatorship -- an absolute disgrace in a modern educated country. This situation led the Sunday Times editorial on the publishing of the first UK "Rich List" to equate the UK with a banana republic.

The book has compiled information that is not even available to government departments. It is a brilliant piece of work.

Tony Blair has kicked the parasite hereditary, largely landowning, peers from the Lords, now to redistribute the land. If we can spend money on redistribution in Zimbabwe, and start the ball rolling in Ireland in the late 1800s then we can do the same in our own backyard, improve the economy, and give social justice to the people at the same time.

I advise all to read it, and absorb the raw facts that we as a nation are being ripped-off good style. That is you, me and everyone else, except the chosen aristocratic and large land owning few. Something has to happen ASAP to rectify this gigantic injustice which would create a more stable and stronger economy as experience in other countries as shown. The kicking out of the Lords of the parasite hereditary peers by Tony Blair is the first step - the total wealth of the 66 hereditary ejected Lords, who are predominantly large landowners owning the equivalent of 4.5 average sized counties, is a whopping 16 billion. Now to do the business....


Our thanks to John Burns-Curtis for sharing this review with The Progress Report.

What are your reactions? Let us know:

Your name

Your email address

Check this box if you'd like to receive occasional Economic Justice Updates via email. No more than one every three weeks on average.

Page One Page Two Archive
Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?

Henry Search Engine