Informed people debate economic policy but should it even exist? Being political, it can’t also be scientific.
How big does a legal marijuana dealer have to be before bankers grant it the same courtesy they do to illegal, violent cartels?
Author Amy Tam notes 300,000 Americans get Lyme disease every year and victims see 10 doctors before getting diagnosed correctly yet the CDC rejects a new test.
As the number of working poor grows, can sensible debate meet everyone’s need for distributive justice, for a fair share of surplus?
“Oil spill” is overly courteous to oil companies since certain spills were not accidents but intentional dumpings; see Ecuador.
It takes all the money of 3,603,103,393 human beings to equal the fortunes of just 85 human beings. Is that an income gap yet?
Since we learn from communicating with others, it’s good to see others communicating the message of revenue justice.
Regular readers may sense deja-vu. A new article covers an old story: smog from Asia, breathed by residents of the West Coast.
In Australia, mortgages are crowding out business loans, which must reach a tipping point some time, if the economy lags.
Public revulsion over the destruction of rice fields and the subsequent suicides of two elders fueled the protest by thousands.
Hip cheap talent has never wanted to live in the burbs. But is that why a tech firm would move to where the rent is too high?
Charleston, once called the Holy City for all its steeples then Silicon Harbor, may next lead The South to sharing the earth.
The poor can’t afford the better food and housing that save money so pay more from their meager income for worse goods.
With major media citing a fine idea, can actually implementing it be far behind? So then all of us could benefit?
Congress not only grants the desires of the very rich, but increasingly they are the very rich; so, what unemployment benefits?