Charleston, once called the Holy City for all its steeples then Silicon Harbor, may next lead The South to sharing the earth.
The poor can’t afford the better food and housing that save money so pay more from their meager income for worse goods.
With major media citing a fine idea, can actually implementing it be far behind? So then all of us could benefit?
Congress not only grants the desires of the very rich, but increasingly they are the very rich; so, what unemployment benefits?
In his last book, in the chapter “Where We Are Going”, MLK advocated an extra income for all and cited Henry George.
Skeptical of globalization? On trade, migration, and markets, the views of even educated laypersons not supported by the data.
As people see the world’s economies in serious trouble and investigate freedom, critics of markets echo old fallacies.
Australia’s Macro Business news site has more good news for its readers: a revenue policy that really works.
If you want to see the sun, the sky, the stars, don’t bother looking up in China but turn to huge public screens for a show.
Too little public spending on levees is a small part of the problem. It is dwarfed by another factor: too much public spending.
Frenchman Etienne Balibar suggests, given the elite’s tax avoidance, “no representation without taxation” is today more appropriate.
People run for office to win for themselves or to raise awareness of good new ideas which could, if implemented, benefit everyone.
Body searches and interrogations – lasting days – are out of proportion with the charges. People lack justice and media.
A house for every family — good idea — as is a share of the worth of Earth, unless a share entices people to exploit the Earth.
The tele-com giants got what they wanted from the lawyers enjoying immunity on an appellate court bench … for now.