Occupy Sandy – A Movement Moves to Relief
|November 15, 2012||Posted by Staff under Activism|
The relief groups present on New York’s battered Queens peninsula: National Guard, FEMA, the Police and Sanitation Departments — and Occupy Sandy, established by Occupy Wall St. How much state do people need? This 2012 article is from the New York Times, Nov 9.
by Alan Feuer
After its encampment in Zuccotti Park, which changed the public discourse about economic inequality and introduced the nation to the trope of the 1 percent, the Occupy movement has wandered in a desert of more intellectual, less visible projects, like farming, fighting debt, and theorizing on banking. While several nouns have been occupied — from summer camp to health care — it is only with Hurricane Sandy that the times have conspired to deliver an event that fully calls upon the movement’s talents and caters to its strengths.
Maligned for months for its purported ineffectiveness, Occupy Wall Street has managed through its storm-related efforts not only to renew the impromptu passions of Zuccotti, but also to tap into an unfulfilled desire among the residents of the city to assist in the recovery. This altruistic urge was initially unmet by larger, more established charity groups, which seemed slow to deliver aid and turned away potential volunteers in droves during the early days of the disaster.
Occupy Wall Street is capable of summoning an army with the posting of a tweet, and many of the volunteers last week were self-identifying veterans of the movement, although many more were not. Given the numbers passing through, both fresh-faced amateurs and the Occupy managerial class — a label it would reject — were in evidence.
Volunteers at field sites in the most hard-hit areas bring flashlights and hot meals to residents.
It’s evidence that when official channels fail, other parts of society respond.
The long-term needs are where the real problems are.
JJS: The Occupier’s last two points — about the self-reliance of non-official people and the long-term problems — are key.
Take the long-term poverty (please!). If people did not have to pay taxes on their houses, than they’d build higher quality ones, as the experience of Sydney Australia shows. And if people did have to pay a levy or dues for the land they claim, then they take less and use that wisely, leaving more land for others. And then others don’t have to do things like in-fill swamps and commit all the other acts that make an ecosystem more vulnerable to storms. Shifting the property tax off buildings, onto locations, is technically easy even if politically hard — but it sure is necessary medicine.
Consider widespread autonomy. If regular Janes and Joes had more resources, they might need less government. If regular people had less outgo and more income, than they might meet their needs in cooperative ways, face to face, rather than in the impersonal way of the state taking people’s money as taxes and returning, for the people’s payment, a mix of social services, waste, and corruption.
What if politicians and bureaucrats were to focus on defending rights? Punishing criminals, fining the dishonest, enforcing environmental standards, and the like, instead of trying to provide so many varied services. Could people take care of themselves?
If they no longer had to pay so many different taxes, imposts in which they had no say in creating, people would probably not feel so powerless. Indeed, feeling more in control of their lives, they might make better life choices in general, and become effective neighbors in times of need. And if they received a share of the revenue raised by land dues, then they’d have more resources for acting on their good intentions.
Libertarians and anarchists should love it! Somebody who did at least like it was the famous science fiction writer Robert Heinlein. In his </i>Number of the Beast, <i>between pages 408-412, he writes: “the United States (called that, although boundaries differ) is not as smothered in laws, regulations, licensing, and taxes as is our native country. There is no category “Lawyers” in the telephone book. Taxation is low, simple-and contains a surprise. The Federal government is supported by a head tax paid by the States, and is mostly for military and foreign affairs. This state derives most of its revenue from real estate taxes. It is a uniform rate set annually, with no property exempted, not even churches, hospitals, or schools-or roads; the best roads are toll roads. The surprise lies in this: The owner appraises his own property.”
If you’d like to understand the economics underlying the policy positions above, check out this teleseminar on war and peace: <A HREF=”http://instantteleseminar.com/?eventid=34431294
” target=_blank> To read more</a>
Comments about Economics of War and Peace:
AMAZING… very powerful! By far the best teleseminar I’ve heard yet. – Hunt Henion, Montana, USA
A really great presentation and the Slideshow was terrific… very well coordinated and put together. The proposals for peace are brilliant. – Rob Wheeler, Maryland, USA
I found the speakers very moving and now have a better understanding regarding the link between war and land.
– Carmel Harty, Melbourne, Australia
The presentation was exceptional! Presenters were all very engaging and powerful.
– Nancy Lea Speer, California, USA
Another amazing seminar! Thanks from down under. – Ana Maria Rodriguez, Tasmania, Australia
Join two US Air Force veterans and Veterans for Peace activists – Frank Dorrel, producer of the video What I’ve Learned About U.S. Foreign Policy, S. Brian Willson, peace activist, author of Blood on the Tracks: The Life and Times of S. Brian Wilson along with Fred Foldvary, economics professor at Santa Clara University who teaches about how to build an economics for a peaceful planet.