Responses to the "War for Natural Resources" Article
Concerning the War for Natural Resources article:
i believe that gerge bush wants to impress his father by finishing what he started
--jacob bourke
jbourke.@sts.tased.edu.au
Sunday March 30, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
what do I think? The administration lies and lies whenever it suits their purposes.
I made a videotape of Dr. Pelletiere's speech at a Carlisle Peace College forum last October. This vido - No War On Iraq!" contains his complete 45 minute talk plus three more hours of interesting talks that day. Available from Earth Rights Institute, Box 328, Scotland, PA 17254 for $15, includes shipping and handling.
--Alanna Hartzok
earthrts@pa.net
Monday March 17, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
please don’t spill oil in the ocean.
--vanessa mansell
vmansell@tasmail.com
Monday March 17, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
It is evidently clear that the Bush Administration and the U.S. allies in this Iraqi showdown is clearly more than the atrocities of Saddam’s regime. With the publication of Pelletiere’s information it is definitely to the western powers advantage to control the water rights and the oil rights to develop another country into the international scheme of things.
--Clifford j. Knowlton
jerryknowlton3@hotmail.com
Tuesday February 25, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
Please have peace...from australia
--cwrand
crand@ree.tas.edu.au
Friday February 14, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
Please have the issue of lack of water in israel as one of the motives for war e-mailed to every newspaers and radio newscast in the country and europe. thank you for the truth.
--
--giovanna scruby
Wednesday February 12, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
Thanks for bringing this to the public debate.
--Frank Harte
fjharte@hotmail.com
Tuesday February 11, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
The ignorance of American people not willing to think and research prior to giving their support to a president to send our children to war. If we continue to give blind support to this administration we may as well take the guns and kill the iraquie people ourselves. The blood is on everyones hands that support this war without requiring complete support for the invasion. And I am a proud american with a son right now in the gulf.
--Claudine
claudine@yahoo.com
Tuesday February 11, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
This another utilitarian trade of blood for oil.
--Paul Goodman
pgoodman@iastate.edu
Monday February 10, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
Where are we able to review the facts supporting these points?
--William Scrafford
wjscrafford@yahoo.com
The publisher replies:
Try contacting the New York Times, where the full article originally appeared, to see if you can reach the author directly. Good luck!
Sunday February 9, 2003
Concerning the War for Natural Resources
article:
Thank you for bringing this article to my attention. It is my opinion that Iran is the most dangerous country in the middle east for many reasons. I have known for a long time that Iraq has no connections to bin laden. Saddam is a secularist of the Ba’thist communist party. Iran is where bin laden’s group got the idea of marytrdom an idea repugnate to sunnis before recently, and is still repugnant to the huge majority. Martyrdom was always from its beginning the central theme of Shi’i Islam. I have very much more to say but that can wait for later. Good bye friends
--Dr. Sara Martindale-Raptis
bichonlady@msn.com
What's your opinion? Tell your views to The Progress Report:
| Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email |
| Page One | Page Two | Archive |
| Discussion Room | Letters | What's Geoism? |
