Monday February 10, 2003 ![]()
![]()
Responses to the "Colin Powell’s Dubious Case for War" Article
Concerning the Colin Powell’s Dubious Case for War article:
Brittish "intelligence reports" quoted by Powell have just been reavealed as a total hoax. They were copied verbatim from the work of an American graduate student, whose source data is twelve years old. And presented before the whole world, as an excuse to go to war.
--
The publisher replies:
The plagiarism scandal was a major event and will be remembered for many years. How strange that the warmongers are so desparate to grasp for wisps of evidence to support their war plans. Why are they desparate? Why not just stick to facts, and when the facts don't justify war, then don't have a war!
Thursday February 6, 2003
Concerning the Colin Powell’s Dubious Case for War article:
“Blix, who directs the UN inspection team in Iraq, said the UNMOVIC inspectors have seen "no evidence" of mobile biological weapons labs, has "no persuasive indications" of Iraq-al Qaeda links, and no evidence of Iraq hiding and moving material used for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) either outside or inside Iraq. Dr. Blix also said there was no evidence of Iraq sending scientists out of the country, of Iraqi intelligence agents posing as scientists, of UNMOVIC conversations being monitored, or of UNMOVIC being penetrated.”
--
Thursday February 6, 2003
Concerning the Colin Powell’s Dubious Case for War article:
No one who has his brains on the right place, will be persuaded by obvious warmongers, hiding their real reasons.Is this a chess-play ? Saddam playing the blacks and the U.S. the whites? If so, let’s turn the board: the U.S plaYing black, Saddam white. All the sentences of the artcle above, containing MIGHT, MAYBE become affirmative because the U.S. already HAVE those weapons and intentions. Fair play ?
--Marcel Schuer
Belgium
What's your opinion? Tell your views to The Progress Report:
Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email
Page One Page Two Archive Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?
![]()