Responses to the "Foldvary: Oil and War and Iraq" Article
Concerning the Foldvary: Oil and War and Iraq article:
It doesn’t seem to me that terrorism in general should be confused with Iraq in particular. I simply do not see the connection.
--
Monday February 17, 2003
Concerning the Foldvary: Oil and War and Iraq
article:
The idea that George Bush is going to war for oil is not realistic on many fronts. First, if we wanted to control a large oil reserve by war we could, with a very minor effort, take over Kuate. We might consider taking over Mexico. It is closer. US companies developed the oil fields in the 1920s only to have them expropriated without compensation by Mexico.
--
Monday February 17, 2003
Concerning the Foldvary: Oil and War and Iraq
article:
Thank you, Fred, for your insightful commentary. Indeed, we must revert, again and again to the fundamental principles we can obsaerve, that humanity seeks liberty in expression, and whereever that freedom is compromised, untoward behavior will inevitably erupt. The economic dynamics of land tenure point the way to meaningful peace policy.
--
Monday February 17, 2003
Concerning the Foldvary: Oil and War and Iraq
article:
Foldvarys analysis of the Blood for oil question would be accurate if the Administration was actually representing American interests. They represent themselves. Look no further then the way land was siezed by the state and eventually ended up making millions for George as Governer. Now he has the US Army ready to scroung for his pillage.
--
What's your opinion? Tell your views to The Progress Report:
| Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email |
| Page One | Page Two | Archive |
| Discussion Room | Letters | What's Geoism? |
