polluters

Taxpayer and Environmental Groups Target 74 Pork Barrel Programs
federal budget

GREEN SCISSORS 2001 EXPOSES $55 BILLION IN WASTEFUL FEDERAL SPENDING THAT HARMS THE ENVIRONMENT

Below is a news announcement from the Green Scissors Coalition (Friends of the Earth, Taxpayers for Common Sense, U.S. Public Interest Research Group).

As the Bush Administration prepares to make tough choices on spending and tax cuts with the release of its budget, a coalition of environmental, taxpayer and consumer groups has released a new report detailing 74 federal programs whose elimination could protect the environment and save taxpayers $55 billion.

"President Bush wants to give taxpayers a break-well, here's a $55 billion start that also protects the environment, " said Erich Pica, Director of the Green Scissors Campaign at Friends of the Earth. "This is the President's opportunity to cut the federal budget using green scissors."

The Green Scissors 2001 report, endorsed by more than 24 organizations, highlights programs that taxpayer, environmental and consumer organizations agree should be cut. Green Scissors 2001 targets ten "Choice Cuts" which are particularly vulnerable to congressional actions as well as nine new programs that hurt the environment and waste taxpayer dollars. The full list of recommended cuts ranges from money-losing timber sales to coal industry subsidies.

"These subsidies only fatten the wallets of corporate interests," said Cena Swisher, Program Director at Taxpayers for Common Sense. "Why are policymakers asking taxpayers to give more of their hard-earned dollars to industries that are seeing record profits?"

Senate Republicans are planning to introduce the National Energy Security Act of 2001 in the next two weeks. Supported by the Bush Administration, this bill is a wish list for the nation's largest polluting industries. If enacted, the bill would give new handouts to the oil, coal, gas and nuclear power industries to destroy our natural resources. The bill would deepen our dependence on fossil fuels, worsen air quality, exacerbate global warming and degrade national treasures like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and western lands -- all at taxpayer expense.

Democrats are backing similar legislation. Senator Byrd (D-WV) has already introduced a bill that would expand taxpayer-funded subsidies and provide exemptions from environmental protections for coal facilities.

"We've already poured billions of dollars into the pockets of mature energy industries at the expense of clean air and a healthy environment," said Lexi Shultz, a staff attorney for U.S. PIRG. "It's time we stopped wasting taxpayer money on dirty, ineffective coal, oil and nuclear programs."

Over the past seven years, the Green Scissors campaign has cut $24 billion in wasteful, environmentally harmful spending programs. In 2000, the coalition successfully fought to force the film industry to pay market-based fees on public lands and oil royalty reforms saving taxpayers $330 million over five years.

The Green Scissors 2001 report targets ten "Choice Cuts" and highlights nine issues that are new to the report. The report's "Choice Cuts" are programs that Congress will probably act upon in some way during the coming year or that are most in need of reform. Green Scissors 2001's "Choice Cuts" include:

Recommendations that are new to the Green Scissors 2001 report this year include:

---------------------------------

For more information and a copy of the report, visit www.greenscissors.org


What's your opinion on the Green Scissors initiative? Tell your views to The Progress Report:

Your name

Your email address

Check this box if you'd like to receive occasional Progress Report Updates via email. No more than one every two weeks on average.


Page One Page Two Archive
Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?

Henry Search Engine