Monopolists Tell Govt to Let Citizens Blow Off Steam
FDA ANNOUNCES PUBLIC MEETINGS ON BIOENGINEERED FOODS
|
The Progress Report's cynical publisher says -- Genetic manipulators and the federal agency that's supposed to oversee them have failed to produce any compelling scientific evidence for the safety of genetically manipulated foods. So, when science does not support you, what's the next strategy for the manipulators to try? How about a public forum! Hold a few of those and then say your unproven processes must be okay, because the public has been told all about them. Bah, humbug! But here is the announcement of the meetings. Attend and make some noise to protect your freedom of choice and your children's safety from the unscientific profit-driven gene manipulators! |
The first public meeting will be held on November 18 in Chicago, Ill., followed by a second on November 30, in Washington, D.C., and a third on December 13, in Oakland, Calif.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Consumer Inquiries: 888-SAFEFOOD
FDA ANNOUNCES PUBLIC MEETINGS ON BIOENGINEERED FOODS
The Food and Drug Administration today announced a new initiative to engage the public about foods made using bioengineering. This initiative will begin with a series of public meetings to be held in Chicago, Ill., Washington, D.C., and Oakland, Calif., this November and December.
At the public meetings, the public will be informed about current FDA policy for assuring the safety of bioengineered foods. The public will be asked whether this policy should be modified and also to comment on appropriate means of providing information to the public about bioengineered products in the food supply.
Under FDA policy developers of bioengineered foods are expected to consult with the agency before marketing such foods, to ensure that all safety and regulatory questions have been fully addressed. (Publisher's note -- "expected," not "required"! Big difference!)
FDA's policy also calls for special labeling for a bioengineered food in certain circumstances. For example, a bioengineered food would need to be called by a different or modified name if its composition were significantly different from its conventionally grown counterpart, or if its nutritive value has been significantly altered. Special labeling would be required if consumers need to be informed about a safety issue, such as the possible presence of an allergen that would not normally be found in the conventionally-grown product. (Publisher's note -- but the manipulators claim their products are not significantly different, even though science does not back them up. That's the whole problem, you dummies!)
"FDA makes sure that our food supply is among the safest in the world," said Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala. "Although people have enthusiastically accepted new drugs made from biotechnology, some consumers have concerns about the use of this technology in foods, and we need to ask why those concerns exist and how we can address them." (Publisher's note -- it is far more than "some consumers" who have concerns, it is the entire scientific community.)
Modern bioengineering was first used to produce consumer products in the early 1980's when FDA approved important new drugs to treat a range of diseases. In the 1990's foods such as tomatoes, corn, and soybeans produced through bioengineering began to appear. To date, biotechnology firms have completed consultation with FDA on more than 40 food products, and a substantial portion of American cropland is planted with seeds produced using this technology. (Publisher's note -- who cares about "consultation"? We want safety, not hobnobbing!)
"FDA's food regulatory system relies on the best science available to protect the public," said FDA Commissioner Jane E. Henney, M.D. "Our scientists are not aware of any reason to question the safety of currently marketed foods produced through bioengineering. Nevertheless, as a science- based agency, FDA will consider any valid scientific information that suggests the agency should reevaluate its process for overseeing the safety of these foods." (Publisher's note -- of course their scientists are not aware of any problems, they have not investigated or looked for any! If you fail to look at something, of course you will see no problem with it!)
The first public meeting will be held on November 18 in Chicago, Ill., followed by a second on November 30, in Washington, D.C., and a third on December 13, in Oakland, Calif.
Will the genetic manipulators and their corrupt FDA cronies succeed in blocking science? Tell your opinion to The Progress Report:
| Page One | Page Two | Archive |
| Discussion Room | Letters | What's Geoism? |
