protestant work ethic hard work leisure workweek

Why Some Like Conservatives & Oppose Liberals
productivity overwork

Why the Protestant Work Ethic Is a Menace to Society

Good riddance to a religious approach that preached salvation through constant hard labor. This 2012 article is from AlterNet, Oct 24.

by Robert S. Becker

For the first time only 48% of Americans deemed themselves Protestant. The dominant majority since Puritan days has shrunk to minority status. Let us project a similar demise for the "Protestant Ethic." That triumphant code consecrates hard work, prosperity, and control over nature.

No doubt, America's affluence mirrors perseverance, especially by underpaid laborers, but consider more critical advantages: freedom from central authority, relative tolerance, thus ethnic diversity, matchless resources (farmland, forests, water, minerals), and truly fortuitous geography, poised between Europe and Asia. Military might, material goods, isolation, and good fortune, not simply workloads, clarify how 5% of the world's population commandeers 20% of most goodies.

What happened to promises of greater leisure time?

What needs challenge isn't work per se but the Protestant work linkages: 1) that worldly success signals heavenly election; 2) that will power alone (and the right Christian values) will overcome all uneven playing fields; and 3) that status (read: money) awards "winners" the moral right to rule the entire roost. In fact, hard work by itself leads to exhaustion, without often gaining a livable wage. And America's celebrated draw of exceptional socio-economic mobility has migrated to Canada and much of Europe and Asia.

Our New Deal's 40-hour week base cut America's average workload by 25% (from 1900 and 1950), yet that didn't stop us from becoming the world's richest economic power ever (not getting devastated by two wars helped).

In fact, leisure advances productivity. Conversely, overwork cuts efficiency while amplifying stress and health problems, impedes exercise, and ups our reliance on coping mechanisms, namely alcohol, cigarettes, and drugs.

Why not start a new crusade to Upend the Protestant Ethic? How hard must we work to find alternatives to the folly of glorying counter-productive, life-taking hard work -- that destroys rather than serves life?

To read more

JJS: An opposite code, which could be dubbed the Polynesian Play Ethic, is growing more popular. You see people urge the acceptance of (not work for, of course) a shorter workweek, more vacation time, simpler living, the slow food movement, etc. But all those things take money. If people already had more money, without more work, they probably would work less and play more.

From where could we all get an extra income? Alaska pays residents a dividend from oil revenue, and other jurisdictions (Aspen CO, Singapore, elsewhere?) do something similar. Could every place pay its citizens a dividend?

Why not? The revenue that comes from people paying for aspects of nature is ideal. Morally, nobody made land or resources and everybody makes nature valuable (by needing sites, minerals, etc). Practically, while not every place has an oil field, everywhere does have a “gold mine” -- downtown locations.

If the urban land is public -- as is Hong Kong’s and most US port districts’ -- then lease it. If it’s private, then tax it. Or institute user fees. Or land dues. However the socially-generated rental value of nature is recovered, it could then be used for an extra income to all. More than likely, it could also fund a svelte government (that does not waste public revenue on corporate welfare and a war machine). Indeed, if land dues are instituted, then the entire tax apparatus could be tossed onto the junk heap of history.

While radical reform of public revenue may seem farfetched, in small ways it is already in place. For example, Fiji recovers ground rent as a matter of routine. To read more . And wherever tried, geonomic policy has worked. May the rest of the world catch up!

---------------------

Editor Jeffery J. Smith runs the Forum on Geonomics and helped prepare a course for the UN on geonomics. To take the “Land Rights” course, click here .

Also see:

McCain Weighs in Again on Campaign Finance
http://www.progress.org/2012/bradpitt.htm

How Much More Work Do Humans Really Need?
http://www.progress.org/2011/laborda.htm

Job Insecurity
www.progress.org/2012/insecuri.htm

Email this articleSign up for free Progress Report updates via email


What are your views? Share your opinions with The Progress Report:

Your name

Your email address

Your nation (or your state, if you're in the USA)

Check this box if you'd like to receive occasional Economic Justice announcements via email. No more than one every three weeks on average.


Page One Page Two Archive
Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?

Henry Search Engine