America -- less equal than ever
A snapshot of income disparity
Think the country as a whole has it bad? Figures from flashy Los Angeles County for wealth inequality paint an even darker picture. This 2010 article is from the Los Angeles Times, Feb 24.
by Tim RuttenOn the eve of our worst financial crisis since the Depression, the United States was -- from an economic standpoint, at least -- a less equal nation than at any time since the Gilded Age.
The sputtering recovery now underway is producing few, if any, jobs to replace those that have been lost. Meanwhile, a variety of factors continues to push wages and most salaries lower. Thus, we're likely to emerge from this downturn with even greater disparities in income, wealth, and effective tax rates, and the forces pushing us in that direction are particularly strong in Los Angeles County.
We have a pre-recession portrait of American inequality because, in 1992, the Clinton administration asked the Internal Revenue Service to begin tracking the incomes and tax payments of the country's 400 richest households. During the George W. Bush years, the IRS continued to collect the data, but -- you'll be shocked to know -- didn't release it to the public.
Last week, the figures for 2007 were quietly made available, and, as David Cay Johnston, who formerly covered tax policy for the New York Times and now teaches at Syracuse University's law school, points out, "The incomes of the top 400 American households soared to a new record high in dollars and as a share of all income in 2007, while the income tax rates they paid fell to a record low."
Between 2006 and 2007, according to the IRS, the average income of the country's 400 top taxpayers rose 31%, from $263.3 million to $344.8 million. At the same time, their effective income tax rate declined more than half a percentage point, from 17.17% in 2006 to 16.62% in 2007.
That's all of a piece with trends documented by economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty, whose research into global income patterns shows that between 1992 and 2007, America's 400 richest households increased their average income by 399%, while the bottom 90% of the country's households gained just 13%. (Those percentages, by the way, reflect inflation-adjusted dollars.)
All this in a country that prides itself on creating opportunity and encouraging social mobility.
And if you narrow the focus to Los Angeles County, the picture is even darker. According to figures compiled by the local chapter of the United Way, 1.47 million, or 15%, of the county's approximately 10.4 million residents are living in poverty, which means an annual income of $22,000 for a family of four. Close to 100,000 of those families are getting by on less than $10,000 a year.
Perhaps worse, 30% of all our full-time workers earn less than $25,000 per year. As a consequence, the percentages of county residents who live in poverty or are counted among the working poor markedly exceed the national averages.
Meanwhile, the national trend toward increasing income inequality is worse in Los Angeles County than in the country as a whole. Over the last two decades, only the top 1% of our salaried workers experienced significant income growth, while men and women earning the county median actually saw their inflation-adjusted hourly income decline by $2.
Over the last 10 years, financial managers enjoyed the largest occupational gains in income. Their average annual salary climbed from $96,302 to $112,632. At the same time, the wages of their executive secretaries and administrative assistants actually fell, from $45,058 to $44,075. Retail sales clerks, janitors, preschool teachers, and medical assistants also experienced declining annual incomes.
Two of our most disturbing pre-recession trends are likely to exacerbate things still further: Over the last decade, we've lost not only 36.1% of all traditional manufacturing jobs but also 16.3% of the positions in film, television, radio, and publishing that are supposed to be a crucial part of the new "knowledge-based" economy. (Our prospects for competing there are further eroded by a school system that continues to graduate a woefully low percentage of high school students.)
It is increasingly imperative that elected officials do some hard and quick thinking. Unless some dramatic, proactive steps are taken, L.A. County seems likely to become the least equal region in an increasingly unequal nation.
JJS: Of all the US states, the one with the least income disparity is not the one with the highest income tax but one without any personal income tax at all, yet with a “rent” dividend. That’d be Alaska, which shares oil revenue among its residents. Sharing “rents” -- the essence of geonomics -- is the best way, better than more jobs or higher wages, to fundamentally and profoundly close the income gap.
Jobs and wages can not succeed. The whole point of techno-progress is to liberate humanity from drudgery. Forcing people to do busy work breaks the human spirit.
What has to happen is for people to feel worthy of an income apart from their labor. They also must feel that all their income is theirs, and that losing some to a tax is not fair. That’ll bring up the income floor.
To bring down the income ceiling, forget about taxing the rich. Just quit subsidizing the rich, like bailing out Wall Street. Instead of giving away government-granted privileges -- everything from corporate charters to land titles -- for a mere pittance (no more than a filing fee), run government like a business and charge the full market value, the annual rental value, for those little pieces of paper such as resource leases and patents and copyrights.
Geonomics will close the income gap with a wallop. And the policy will close the political power gap, too. So we won’t have to worry about inequality ever rising again.
Jeffery J. Smith runs the Forum on Geonomics.
Is History Siding With Obama's Economic Plan?
The New Rentier Class
Getting a raise for losing money? Come again?
Email this article Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email
What are your views? Share your opinions with The Progress Report:
Page One Page Two Archive Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?