Is the endless war on drugs worth it?
New FBI data suggest arresting druggies a waste
| The bulk of drug arrests in 2008 were for simple possession, almost half for marijuana. Could we put police to better use? And put our public revenue to better use? And would as many people turn to drugs in a just society? This 2009 article is from The Christian Science Monitor, Sept 15. |
by Patrik Jonsson, Staff writer
Every 18 seconds, an American is busted for drug possession, according to Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) crime statistics released recently.The new statistics point to a continued emphasis on drug interdiction -- otherwise known as the "war on drugs" – that more and more law enforcement officers are now questioning. While many experts hold the anti-drug campaign to be the key reason for the decline in the crime rate in the US, especially violent crime, since the 1990s, these police officers, as well as current and retired judges and prosecutors see, instead, thousands of American lives ruined for small drug infractions in a costly and possibly unwinnable "war."
"Not only do these officers see the terrible results that their work has had on individuals' lives, but a lot of what I hear from beat officers and undercover narcotics agents is they've seen colleagues die in the line of fire trying to enforce laws that have no positive impacts," says Tom Angell, a spokesman for Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP) in Washington. "For a lot of them, this is about trying to keep good cops alive by repealing stupid prohibition laws."
According to the latest FBI figures, 82.3 percent of all drug arrests in 2008 were for possession, and 44.3 percent of these for possession of marijuana. Arrests totalled more than 1.7 million.
"You can get over an addiction, but you will never get over a conviction, said Jack Cole, a retired undercover narcotics agent and LEAP director, in a statement Tuesday about the "collateral consequences" of the war on drugs.
- Changing attitudes
The emergence of frontline officers speaking out against the war on drugs is helping to kindle a debate about legalization of drugs across the US, says Mr. Angell. It is even driving a Congressional bill written by Sen. Jim Webb (D) of Virigina to establish a new Blue Ribbon justice system panel that would take a serious look at drug legalization.
The US could gain $77 billion in revenue a year by legalizing -- and taxing -- marijuana, cocaine, and heroin, says LEAP.
Culturally, attitudes about drugs may be changing. A Zogby poll in May showed for that the first time a majority of Americans favor decriminalizing marijuana. States such as Massachusetts and California have already taken steps in that direction.
"[Most] drugs are more readily available at lower prices today than when Nixon declared a war against it," says Norm Stamper, a former Seattle police chief and a staunch proponent of drug legalization, referring in part to the lower price of marijuana.
However, White House "drug czar" Gil Kerlikowske recently said, "Legalization is not in the president's vocabulary and it's not in mine."
- Sending the wrong message?
Pro-legalization groups are missing the forest for the trees, says Gregory D. Lee, a retired Drug Enforcement Administration agent. He says the dwindling crime rate across the US is directly correlated to the government's investment in border and street interdiction.
"Legalization sends a message that it's okay to do drugs when in reality these drugs have a tremendous impact on the future of the people who take them," he says. "[Under legalization], the crime rate would rise because of crimes committed by people under the influence of these substances."
Mr. Lee points to the rising price of cocaine in the US as a sign that domestic and international interdiction is working. "The war on drugs," he says, "is being won."
JJS: Even if that were the case -- and noting the power of drug lords in Latin American countries, in US foreign policy, and in jail where prisoners have cheap and easy access to the drugs that put them there, perhaps it is not the case -- do ends justify means? And why not spend public revenue on creating a society that’s so happy that the druggy alternatives to reality would have little or no appeal? Using geonomics -- the “green” shift of taxes and subsidies -- we could create economic justice, the basis of a world working right for everybody.
---------------------
Jeffery J. Smith runs the Forum on Geonomics.
|
Also see: Mainstream media gives voice to reason
Government needs to trim its budget somehow
Pew study finds … |
| Email this article | Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email |
What are your views? Share your opinions with The Progress Report:
| Page One | Page Two | Archive |
| Discussion Room | Letters | What's Geoism? |
