Ultimately stop the subsidies flow; meanwhile how about …
Stopping the weapons flow
| The weapons trade may be the most egregious example of what's wrong with subsidies, with letting politicians decide how to spend public revenue, rather than paying dividends to citizens so they can use the funds for their own real needs. We rerun and add to this 2008 editorial of April 24. |
Editors of The Los Angeles Times
It's a rare moment when three African nations, in an effort to forestall violence, block a shipment of weapons to a neighboring country in political turmoil. It's perhaps even a historic development when those weapons were sold by a great power and were bound for a government that is not under United Nations sanctions and has every legal right to buy arms -- though no moral right to do so.So let us praise the courageous peoples of South Africa, Mozambique, and Zambia for refusing to allow the Chinese freighter An Yue Jiang to unload its deadly cargo: 77 tons of rockets, mortars, and ammunition, manufactured by a Chinese state-owned enterprise, purchased by the government of Zimbabwe, and virtually certain to be used by President Robert Mugabe to repress his opposition following an election that he may have lost.
Mugabe's neighboring leaders had been loath to criticize the former independence fighter even as his reign descended from the merely bad into the abominable.
- * South African President Thabo Mbeki did not ask Mugabe to release the disputed election tallies until his own country was flooded with refugees from Mugabe's violent crackdown. But if Mbeki sympathized with Mugabe, the dockworkers of Durban identified with Mugabe's victims. They understood that sending the weapons to Zimbabwe would have been the moral equivalent of shipping machetes to Rwanda in 1994, and they refused to unload the cargo.
* Next, an Anglican archbishop asked a South African court not to allow the weapons to be transported to land-locked Zimbabwe. The court agreed, and the Chinese freighter, by now dubbed the “Ship of Shame,” departed Durban.
* The boat bearing the tools of evil was refused entry by Mozambique and Zambia.
The hosts of the Beijing Olympics should bring home the freighter and its unwanted cargo and reflect on whether China intends to become a compassionate global citizen or the very type of capitalist predator it fought a revolution to defeat.
What is extraordinary about this incident is that African civil society -- journalists and judges, human rights groups, and unions, backed by U.S. and British diplomats wisely working behind the scenes -- made it palatable for these African governments to do the right thing. They have shown that simple acts can help protect civilians against war crimes and crimes against humanity, a responsibility that was enshrined in a 2006 U.N. Security Council resolution but is often seen as impossible to uphold. This is the best kind of conflict prevention.
JJS: One reason governments can so blithely disregard human life is because most human beings surrender without a whimper portions of their property, their earnings, and their time to the state. Exercising such power over others must make our rulers feel freely disposed toward treating unique individuals as merely a mass of pawns. Hence we should put government on a quid pro quo basis and replace arbitrary taxation with user-fees and citizenship dues.
By the way, to keep current on the number of lives lost to war and other violence, one can visit the World Clock. It updates all sorts of statistics, including petroleum extracted and computers produced. It’s created by Poodwaddle and found at Chippynews (whatever those two names mean).
---------------------
Jeffery J. Smith runs the Forum on Geonomics.
|
Also see: Stop Funding the Taliban with US Money!
Statement by 100 Nobel Prize Winners
Europeans and Americans -- Some Differences |
| Email this article | Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email |
What are your views? Share your opinions with The Progress Report:
| Page One | Page Two | Archive |
| Discussion Room | Letters | What's Geoism? |
