![]()
Corporate Welfare Queens Draw Attention
![]()
New U.S. House Bill Aims to Lower Subsidies to Oil and Gas Sector
American taxpayers want to stop corporate welfare giveaways, but will Congress cooperate? Here is an excerpt from the latest news report from Subsidy Watch, a publication of the Global Subsidies Initiative, an organization that notices corporate welfare scandals.
by Fernando Cabrera
The United States House of Representatives passed legislation last month that would lower tax breaks and other subsidies that the United States government grants the oil industry.The bill, entitled the Creating Long-Term Energy Alternatives for the Nation Act, (the so-called CLEAN Energy Act) is intended to raise billions of dollars that will be funneled toward energy conservation and renewable energy, by eliminating certain tax deductions and credits given to oil and gas companies, as well as raising royalty payments for oil drilled on government lands.
A preliminary study released by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill would cut direct government spending by about USD 6.3 billion between 2007 and 2017. Meanwhile, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that government revenue would increase by USD 7.7 billion over the same period.
Subsidy Watch spoke to Eric Pica of the Washington-based non-profit Friends of the Earth, who supported the measure for what he saw as a significant first step toward lowering the large subsidies received by the oil and gas sector in the United States. He acknowledged, however, that the cut represented a relatively small percentage of the direct subsidies the oil and gas industry receives.
A report issued last November by Friends of the Earth estimated that the oil and gas sector actually received over USD 6 billion annually in direct assistance.
Mr. Pica was also supportive of the new renewable energy fund, although he worried about how the fund would be deployed. In particular, Mr. Pica warned against increasing support for corn-based ethanol due to the amount of chemical and energy inputs it requires. In his opinion, the money would be better spent on research and on promoting other alternative fuels, such as cellulose-based ethanol, wind and solar power, and geo-thermal energy.
Steve Ellis of the non-partisan budget watchdog, Taxpayers for Common Sense (TCS) agreed that the proposed legislation was a positive step, although incomplete. “At the end of the day, what the Democrats didn’t tackle are some of the more long-established subsidies, such as the percentage depletion allowance and some other subsidies that have been in law for over ninety years,” said Mr. Ellis.
TCS supports the phasing out of all subsidies to the energy sector, including those to renewable energy sources. “Generally, the renewable [energy] folks have always been outmanned and outgunned by the big oil and gas companies, so they would do better with a level playing field than with the subsidies arms-race,” he said.
The bill will now move to the Senate for approval, where it may face some changes. If it is eventually approved by that body, it could still run into a presidential veto. It that case, the current support shown by the House vote would fall short of the two-thirds support from both houses that is needed to override a veto.
----------------------
Our thanks to the Global Subsidies Initiative for pursuing this topic.
Also see: Deficit-Laden Congress Boosts Welfare Handouts to Profitable Corporations
http://www.progress.org/2006/repa09.htmHelp Taxpayers -- Take Big Oil Off Welfare
http://www.progress.org/2006/oil22.htmCitizens Sue Welfare Cheats
http://www.progress.org/2006/corp20.htm
Email this article Sign up for free Progress Report updates via email
What are your views? Share your opinions with The Progress Report:
Page One Page Two Archive Discussion Room Letters What's Geoism?
![]()